Archive for June, 2011

c/c reading 008: dana ward, thom donovan, joseph bradshaw

c/c reading 008:

(Saturday, 9 July 2011

Dana Ward

Thom Donovan

Joseph Bradshaw

We’d like to gratefully invite you to the eighth installment of the c/c reading series, featuring a brilliant trio of writers.

Fergie’s Pub

1214 Sansom St.

700pm to 900pm

(Free – $5 suggested donation)

Thanks and look forward to seeing you there!

- Jamie Townsend & Nicholas A. DeBoer

 

Joseph Bradshaw was born in Idaho and spent an itinerant childhood along the west coast. He was a founding editor of FO(A)RM Magazine, and for several years co-curated the Spare Room reading series in Portland, OR. He is the author of two chapbooks, The Way Birds Become (Weather Press: 2007), and This Ocean, or Oppen Series (Cannibal Books: 2008), and the book In the Common Dream of George Oppen (Shearsman Books: 2011). He now lives in Brooklyn, NY, where he works as an archivist.

Thom Donovan is a writer, curator, editor, and archivist. He edits the weblog Wild Horses Of Fire, now in its 6th year! Co-edits ON Contemporary Practice, a print journal for critical writings and conversations about one’s contemporaries. He also edits the web archive, Others Letters, featuring correspondence about contemporary practices across the arts, and co-curates The Project for an Archive of the Future Anterior, a live interview series and video archive concerning the immanence of possible futures. His work has appeared widely in print and online and includes critical works in Afterall, BOMB, PAJ, and The Brooklyn Rail. His first full-length book, The Hole, is forthcoming with Displaced Press. He is currently at work revising and editing a book of essays and statements, Sovereignty and Us: Critical Objects 2005-2010.

Dana Ward is the author of, most recently, The Squeakquel (Song Cave 2011). His book This Can’t Be Life is coming out this fall from Edge Books. He’s currently writing a long work that will be published by Futurepoem Press late in 2012. He lives in Cincinnati where hosts the Cy Press Poetry reading series at Thunder Sky Gallery.

 

c/c 007 introductions

Well.  The Next Objectivists came and knocked back the birds here in Philadelphia.  In that way, my distinct pleasure comes in tossing out the keepsake of their introductions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group Introduction:

‘Can you send me the link information for the Thursday Objectivist workshop?’ That’s all it was. I had spent a year and a half in Chicago, unable to find that primeval connection. I had gotten used to that form of hermitage that exists after trauma. It takes its home in you, like a parasitic grief, that knows that with the right tweaks, you will tumble down and deep into your depression.

This didn’t happen. In the early weeks of October 2009, I found myself 24-hrs without sleep sitting across from people who knew poetry, that took it as space in their lungs. But what was more, they wanted to investigate, they wanted to break down and get intimate with the perusal. It isn’t anything new, this has been going on for hundreds, thousands of years. People get together and talk the talk of the arts. But, I could argue. I could get gruff and stumble into my own thoughts without a lot of clever face dancing and glad-handing deliveries.

Yet, what was really happening was a home was in the pipeline. I mean, that’s the great thing about the human race, we make homes on the fly. We get all dumb with excitement and the next thing you know, you too could already be a Next Objectivist. Founded in January of 2009, the mission is, “to live poetry differently…to resist the increasingly intense pressures to privatize poetic practice that result from & help to perpetuate neoliberal hegemony by doing poetry in ways that were captured by the economy in cultural capital as its being regulated today.” Twice a month the Next Objectivists Poetry Workshop meets, a workshop that has and will ‘insist upon being autonomous, free & open-to-the-public,’ where they investigate the processes of poetry.

And through this they are engage n “an ongoing endeavor to produce a new kind of autonomous poetry.” They have, “poetypists (to) transcribe material given to them by ordinary people at public & semi-public events. Workshop members & the public at large work together to revise the transcribed material into poems which have no individual authorship.”

That’s the import. As Roland Barthes points out, “everything is to be disentangled, nothing deciphered; the structure can be followed, ‘run’ (like the thread of a stocking) at every point and at every level, but there is nothing beneath: the space of writing is to be ranged over, not pierced; writing ceaselessly posits meaning ceaselessly to evaporate it, carrying out a systematic exemption of meaning.”

But, hey, that’s how it works. All of a sudden it’s 830 in the morning and you are putting up posters, and setting out typewriters on a conference table, helping create the living oral dialogue into a poetry of and by the people that move in and out of the rooms you’re in. What is so magnificent about the Next Objectivists is the engagement. These are the moving bodies, the poetry of the multitude.

Denise Dooley: I like immediacy. A hit to the body, a register that doesn’t level off right away. Dooley writes, “All night there are wolves at/the door and I wake there are/wolves at the door.” It’s a fever rush, that streak of sweat that aligns itself on your brow and waits to pour salt into the eye. There is this availability, where once you start feeling the line, it starts to deepen its motivations, it starts to aim in like a spy satellite. She writes in Drumtops, “rising black/ant hulls in spill shape/parameter of lost or melted/soda,/still the birds/rioting around it open.” Once I’m in, I can see it, this army of black ants, like a ship hull spilling down and over all the lost places of the concrete sidewalks and they rally around the corn syrup of the soda and above them the birds riot, riot open, preparing. I like immediacy, I like it now. Would you please welcome Denise Dooley.

Adam Weg: A frequency, a pulse, persistence, that wobble and flow over riverbed rocks. The things it touches shoots solid bolts up. Weg writes, “Quote something that hasn’t been said before/between us, so it’s just the two of us, and these/elements of another/volunteered in ten different directions. It’s all being lifted into/eating acid and chips fall, but cover our tracks.” It is the stream gone succinct, moments that feel as though they are my own memories. An attachment, quartering off inside a dusty room of a dying grandparent. Weg writes, “the problem, the/erupting off us/the minute/you attribute it/to memory/although though/it’s my neck that’s/is insane/a memory/the etiquette/we attribute to memory/Now put up his eyes’. I read with a breach of my hull and as the water starts riding into the shell of my body, the memory fractures, fucks up, my lungs fill up with fluid and I’m almost there. Would you please welcome Adam Weg.

Matthias Regan:

It’s all too much. Sometimes. Sometimes you have a lot sitting on your vocal chords. And I do. And I could stand up here and commit to synthesizing, but it would be reactionary without the wares. So, what can I say? Well, if I’m going to belly up, this is an engineer, a maker of countless worlds, the action, not a self-actualizing scribbler, not a hip-fat capitalist, but embodiment of a landscape that he is but one voice, anonymous, a multitude or the heteroglossia. He sees because he has sat long and still enough to know, to be of a poetry from the outside. In Code Book Code, Regan writes, “1 shadow/moved darkest/against the river wall – /some sand blown up/the scene was set:/it’s a neighborhood threat.” A little Iggy Pop strewn over the shadows rolling up against the green rust, sand lost to the design of its storyboard.

In some ways, perhaps, what I’m really aiming at, what I can only scratch the surface of, is that this is the good fight. A place to plant a flag. In Gapers’ Delay: A Harmolodic Essay on Unwanted Acceleration, we find ourselves in a meta-universe collapsing. “Our ashcan life whispers its remorse/in the bitter hours of an afternoon//stalled between the last of the lunch rush/& the earliest the shift manager/will ever let us leave -.” And I guess that’s where I come in, a little gift for Saturday afternoon. Would you please welcome Matthias Regan.

c/c reading 007: matthias regan, adam weg, denise dooley (next objectivists)

c/c reading 007:

(Saturday, 25 June 2011)

Matthias Regan

Adam Weg

Denise Dooley

 

We are quite pleased to announce the seventh in the c/c reading series.  A special event, bringing three members of the Chicago based Next Objectivists.  From their website, “The Next Objectivists is the world’s only literary workshop entirely dedicated to the study and practice of objectivist poetry. We are a free school of poets and critics pursuing the techniques of writing poetry from outside the self. Our program of study is largely organized by the participants.”

In my own thoughts, during my tenure of two years in Chicago, the Next Objectivists were the high-water-mark guides that gave me a voice in the multitude of their own.  A group of poets with such genuine and honest abilities to the world, that they are a match in the most beautiful hearts I have seen.

Fergie’s Pub

1214 Sansom St

530pm to 730pm

(Free – $5 suggested donation)

Thanks and look forward to seeing you there!

- Jamie Townsend & Nicholas A DeBoer

Matthias Regan is a founding member of the Next Objectivists poetry workshop and the author of many chapbooks, broadsides and poetry pamphlets. He teaches at North Central College near Chicago.

Adam Weg is a social poet and social worker still living in Chicago, IL. He is a member of the Next Objectivist workshop.

Denise Dooley reads and writes with the Next Objectivist Workshop at Mess Hall and with a reading series called Drink Drink Snack.  Her chapbook Drumtops is available through con/crescent press.


c/c reading 006 introductions

This past Wednesday, we had the incredible luck to introduce David Wolach & Eleni Stecopoulos.

David Wolach: The most telling point of my childhood, ‘is’. ‘Is’ activates. ‘Is’ registers a static scar passed from my father’s mouth, my mother’s mouth, from so many mouths that ‘is’ became the narrative. Wolach writes, “drawn by sleepwalks, by our consequence hiding. a smear/made by the mouth biting the marked and readymade knuckle”. It’s entirely possible that my earliest memory is is.

A petition made to the stars, a kind of fragmented Picatrix, where we cut into our bones, detail the ritual of a memetic magick. All of our consequences refer to the hidden hinges in our bodies, as Wolach writes, “…taste first the blood/that is not like but blood and only/blood.” Viral tones, a few words, but this blood, simple and effective, delivery. When I read David Wolach, I boil, etch new and bolder visions of this surveillant. All my life, the war has been a televised culling of Humwawa, face a mass of entrails, breath the stench of shit, the aroma of death everywhere. Life of endless nameless mourning and grief. Wolach writes, “i am the accident of water that licked/the doors of your dumbeyed mythos,” and I see the blood as water, inching slowly to that explosive is, mythos of this not-late-enough capitalism.

Be a body and if you’d like to follow at least one instruction, follow this one, page 134 of Occultations, “learn the ugly algorithms/to uncertain & a question: ‘if you dig deeper’. Please welcome David Wolach. ND

Eleni Stecopoulos: “incarnate will to power … will strive to grow, spread, seize, become predominant – not from any morality or immorality but because it is living…” (Nietzsche – “Beyond Good and Evil”). “Because our sickness was our style or our recovery / the style of our sickness…” (Armies of Compassion 66). A virulent ”will to power” finds itself deeply entrenched in the rhetoric of contemporary America, manifesting the visible symptoms of an illness we all exist within: depression, disintegration, imbalance; that is, the language of war, of hatred and fear channeled through the polis, brings with it the threat of bodily malignance. Yet, at the same time, language has the ability to be a force of physical and cultural regeneration, of healing and reconnection. With her poetry Eleni Stecopoulos stages interventions of thought and material language that bring forth the potential of balance by process, remediation through a probing opacity. In her vital book “Armies of Compassion” Eleni writes: “I am dedicated to my research” (26). Within, her poetics of critique poses questions without striving for definitives. By doing so Eleni’s dedicated research attends to the reader, touching spaces overburdened by cultural strain, allowing the body to find rest once again within its own intricate riddle. After all, as she writes: “Nation is a form of muscle testing” and we have been tensed to the point of breaking for too long. Thank you Eleni for your poetics of healing, and everyone, please welcome Eleni Stecopoulos. JT

c/c reading 005 introductions

This past Saturday we were lucky enough to introduce the amazing power trio of Ariana Reines, Dottie Lasky & Marion Bell.

Marion Bell: Honor the body. Honor the bodies of the present with the witness available to the self, or witness of our breath from ourselves. Bell writes, “i don’t enter time/by watching it/& i don’t ever say my secret narrative of myself,” and through this I find myself making a tenderness outstretch its form, to take the error of living to be the genuine. It’s the genuine I reach for, moving space is deeper, knows a sense of anxiety befoul of itself. “Our will to love/things/inhering,” or “am i one?/you say/avow little i/big other/am i one/when you/say.”

It is my heart. I see the world in my heart, a power to move something as heavy as the tension of the world toward and of itself. Something that can only be shrugged, it is the space, the physical space versus being out of it. Would you please welcome Marion Bell. ND

Dorothea Lasky: I was nervous to write something in way of introducing Dottie’s work, mostly because her writing speaks to me in a way that I cannot easily begin delineate, or analyze. It is a work that you experience, primarily, in the way you would natural events: a weather system, a living thing, a transfer of energy. I find myself, by way of entry, thinking elementally, as an Aries, of the different fires I feel in her poems. As fire, there is a warmth & restless activity; the poetry breathes deeply and drawing in the surrounding air, finds commonality: “The burnt sun was made to care, so it cares for you / So look at it lovingly, stroke its hot shoulders, the bright light coming out of it was made for you” (Things). This fire and light is song, worshipful, something that creates awe; “only through song am I able to sum up so many words into a few” (Ars Poetica). The summation of Dottie’s open, gorgeous song is a blaze of personality — the affective self completely present, bright as life, as a flare in the surrounding darkness. I want to close by reading two quotes from poets that Dottie has expressed a deep connection to, and whose work also burns intensely with personality: “Out of the ash I rise / with my red hair / and I eat men like air” (Plath – “Lady Lazarus”). “the man is a girl — in black & white, / she sings / there are brush fires burning” (B. Mayer – “We’ve Solved the Problem”). Please welcome Dottie Lasky. JT

Ariana Reines: Hello. So, this is planet Earth. And there are things here. Things that appear and disappear, that exist in moments right away and distantly on fire. Things that crack the veins, filling the Earth with oil ink of blood. And there are voices that hear the fucking breath of those moments. “Are you so intelligent your body doesn’t have you in it./Everything could be beautiful maybe,’ Reines writes in The Cow. In Mercury she says, “A face doesn’t have to mean anything, everything too much and whatever it breaks is where something true will have had to have happened and will have.” Yes, yes, thats my absolutely, but what can I say about Ariana Reines?

I have had an addiction kept with the Situationist International. They say the spectacle’s sole message is, “What appears is good; what is good appears,” they say that when the concrete, touchable, tasteable reality is transformed into mere images, mere images become real beings. For me, Reines poetry is that opposite, that opposing. It’s that force, a time period my roommate points out to be her ‘Sad Coffee Stained Notebook’. You want to copy it all down, transcribe it. Cause, when you read it, you can explode that shift, like that very first time on acid, holding the grip of your fingers and blind blast circuits of the mind.

Say is slow like words. In Cour de Lion, “When I thought/I could absolve myself of my big/Emotions by humiliating them./I don’t know what I think tonight/But I know where I am/This second lost without you’. Through the troubadour, the cult of amor, that Albigensian notion to be in the vulgar tongue, to claim that all material is corruptible is where I locate these poems, the lines of the face that have sight. In Mercury, Reines writes, “Time to tell the difference between what’s emitted and what’s left over and what was there in the first place.” It is that time, of that import that the poems reach me here, on planet Earth, where maybe for the first time in a long while, I’m not alone. And in Cour de Lion, “This is lyric poetry. It has to be. It has/No other hope!” Would you please welcome Ariana Reines. ND